A blog about everything, because everything is, or will be, history. Mostly, it's about politics, media, pop culture, and the occasional automobile.
Tuesday, May 31, 2005
Orson Scott Card redux
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
"Right wing bloggers howl. . ."
I'm not keen on the filibuster deal, but if the right is as upset as this article indicates (along with many others I've not linked to), I could learn to like it.
I am a Scientific American
Monday, May 23, 2005
Letter to the Editor
Jonah Goldberg, following George Bush, argues that the U.S. betrayed Eastern Europe at the end of World War II at the Yalta Conference. He fails to acknowledge the historical reality that Eastern Europe was already under the control of the Soviet Union, which had thousands of troops there, fresh from defeating the Nazis. It would have required another war to remove them by force. Thousands would have died, perhaps millions if the U.S. had chosen to use atomic bombs in Eastern Europe or Russia. The bomb was still a well-kept secret; Roosevelt would have been foolish to use it as a bargaining chip to get the Russians out of Eastern Europe.
By overlooking history and painting Franklin D. Roosevelt as a traitor to Eastern Europe, Goldberg seeks to tarnish the image of the 20th century’s greatest president. By doing so, he can undermine faith in Roosevelt’s other accomplishments, particularly Social Security. Roosevelt’s greatest achievement, saving capitalism itself in the United States, is never mentioned by his many detractors on the right, Goldberg included.
If Goldberg wants the U.S. to apologize for something, he should go to Central America, where Cold War policies of Republican presidents caused the CIA-led overthrow of an elected government in Guatemala (1954) or to the support of death squads and the attempted overthrow of an elected government in El Salvador and Nicaragua, respectively (1980s). Why select only the politically and militarily necessary consequences of Yalta for criticism instead of more outrageous breaches of human rights and international law? It’s obvious that the politics of 2005 are more at issue here than the history of 1945.
It was longer at first, but I had to cut it for publication. In the future, I'll post the longer versions.
Friday, May 20, 2005
Disturbing toys
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
Moyers
Monday, May 16, 2005
The Future: Doom and Gloom edition
This interview with author James Howard Kunstler discusses his new book, The Long Emergency, which argues that the U.S. (and the world) are slowly heading toward a future in which the economic boom fueled (pun intended) by oil will ultimately end. The biggest casualty in the U.S. will be the suburbs, where one is able to live an urban life in a rural setting only because of one’s use of and dependence on oil. It’s a scary scenario not because I may live to see it (though I may) but because my children will live to see it. Kunstler sees little to no possibility of a new, cheap, energy source anytime in the near future, and it’s entirely possible that being able to shoe horses may be a more valuable skill than being able to set up a wireless network.
Also of interest in the interview is the discussion of the real estate boom and coming bust. Kunstler says that the real estate bubble is “a consequence of capital desperately seeking a way to increase in an industrial economy that has ceased to grow. America is no longer producing wealth in the conventional sense. And so the housing bubble is a way for residual capital to produce wealth. But like all bubbles, it's a delusional thing that will probably end in tears.”
It’s a disturbing view of the future: it rejects unfounded optimism, technology, and globalism. I won’t miss suburbia; in fact, I hate it with a passion. The identi-houses, ever-increasing traffic problems, new subdivisions being built on top of farms and fields with histories going back thousands of years, all fill me with dread and a desire to wipe the map clean. However, I’ve also always been a fan of technology and have been optimistic about the prospects for the future, no matter how bad the present gets.